There will often be
occasions where an employer has an issue
with an employee’s conduct usually, but
not always, whilst at work. The employer
should have in place an appropriate
disciplinary procedure which should be
followed when this situation arises.
The purpose of any
disciplinary procedure is to help and
encourage all employees to achieve and
maintain standards of conduct,
attendance and job performance and to
ensure that any failure to observe the
employer’s rules is fairly dealt with.
However, the employer will also be
required to demonstrate that a fair
procedure has been followed if it
becomes necessary to consider dismissing
an employee for an act or series of acts
of misconduct.
Investigation,
In serious cases of
misconduct no action should be taken by
an employer before a proper
investigation has been carried out
relating to the circumstances of the
matter complained of. If appropriate,
the employer may consider suspending an
employee from work for a specified
period whilst the investigation is
undertaken. However, if the employee is
suspended their contract of employment
must continue together with all rights
which the employee has under the
contract including payment of
salary/wages.
Disciplinary Hearing.
If as a result of the
investigation it appears that an act of
misconduct has been committed the
employer should proceed with a
disciplinary hearing. The employee
should be given details in writing of
the complaint sufficiently in advance of
the hearing in order to permit them to
prepare themselves. At the hearing the
employee should be given the opportunity
to state their case and the employee
should also be permitted to be
accompanied by a fellow employee of
their choice.
Minor Acts of
Misconduct.
Misconduct offences
broadly fall within two categories –
those that justify instant dismissal
without notice or payment in lieu (often
referred to as gross misconduct) and
less serious offences which may
ultimately lead to dismissal with notice
if repeated more than once.
Examples of the
latter category include bad
time-keeping, unreasonable or
unexplained absence, persistent or
irregular absenteeism, minor damage to
an employer’s property, smoking in
no-smoking areas, use of obscene or
offensive language, etc. It is highly
advisable for employer’s to set out a
non-exclusive list of examples in their
disciplinary procedure.
Procedure.
The following
procedure should apply in cases of minor
acts of misconduct:
-
Oral Warning
-
First Written
Warning
-
Final Written
Warning
-
Dismissal
In relation to the
above, the employer should reserve the
right in the disciplinary procedure to
instigate the procedure at any stage if
appropriate and/or, if necessary, to
omit any particular stage depending on
the severity of the misconduct. This
would, for example, permit an employer
to issue a final written warning for a
first offence if the offence is serious
but falls just short of gross
misconduct.
Gross Misconduct.
Examples of gross
misconduct include theft, physical
assault, breach of duty of
confidentiality, sexual or racial
harassment, fighting, wilful damage to
an employers property, sale and/or
consumption of alcohol or drugs at work
or being under the influence of alcohol
or drugs at work, and failure to comply
with lawful and reasonable instructions,
etc. Once again, it is highly advisable
for employer’s to set out a
non-exclusive list of examples of gross
misconduct in their disciplinary
procedure.
Appeals.
An employee should
always be given the chance to appeal
against any disciplinary decision taken
against them. The appeal should be
chaired, if possible, by someone who was
not party to the investigation into the
offence or the subsequent disciplinary
hearing. At the appeal the employee
should be entitled to attend to state
their case and to be accompanied by a
fellow employee of their choice.
PROCEDURE CHECKLIST
If in doubt always
refer to the following procedure
checklist when conducting a disciplinary
procedure:
-
All relevant
facts should be gathered promptly
before memories fade. If necessary
statements should be taken and
documents collected. In serious
cases suspension should be
considered with pay while an
investigation is conducted.
-
The complaint
must be clear and the question
should be asked is action needed at
this stage
-
If action is
needed it is necessary to decide if
that action should be advice and
counselling, or, formal disciplinary
action.
-
If formal action
is required a disciplinary interview
should be arranged. It is necessary
to ensure:
-
the employee is
aware of the nature of the complaint
and that the interview is a
disciplinary one.
-
that the employee
is told where and when the interview
will take place and of their right
to be accompanied.
-
that if possible
a second member of management is
present.
-
At the beginning
of the interview those present
should be introduced and the purpose
of the interview explained. Also the
employee should be informed of the
nature of the complaint and given
details of supporting evidence.
-
The employee
should be allowed to state his case
and consideration should be given to
any explanations put forward.
-
If new facts
emerge it may be necessary to decide
whether further investigation is
required. If so the interview should
be adjourned and re-convened when
the investigation is completed.
-
Unless the case
is very straightforward an
adjournment should be called before
reaching a decision. A clear view
needs to be arrived at on the facts,
and if they are disputed it will be
necessary to decide on the balance
of probability what version of the
facts is true.
-
Before deciding
on the penalty consideration must be
given to:
-
the gravity
of the offence and whether the
disciplinary procedure gives
guidance
-
the penalty
applied to similar cases in the
past;
-
the
employee's disciplinary record
and general service;
-
any
mitigating circumstances;
-
whether the
proposed penalty is reasonable
in the circumstances.
-
The disciplinary
interview should then be re-convened
to clearly inform the employee of
the decision and penalty, if any.
The employee's right of appeal and
how it operates should be explained.
In the case of a warning the
improvement expected, how long the
warning will last before further
action is taken, and the
consequences of this further action
on a failure to improve should all
be explained.
-
A record of the
action taken needs to be made. If
more than an oral warning has been
given the disciplinary action must
be confirmed to the employee in
writing and a simple record of the
action kept on file for future
reference.
-
The employee must
be given the right of appeal. If the
right of appeal is exercised by the
employee a further hearing should be
arranged. This should be chaired by
a higher level of management if
possible, specifically someone not
involved in the disciplinary process
itself. The employee should be
given, once again, the opportunity
to state his case and put forward
any explanations.
-
The emphasis on
the appeal hearing is to ensure the
disciplinary hearing was carried out
correctly, the evidence presented
appropriately, and the employee
given the opportunity to present his
case. It does not need to be a
re-hearing of the original
disciplinary hearing unless there
have been procedural errors which
need to be addressed, or new
evidence has come to light. In such
circumstances a re-convened
disciplinary hearing usually should
be called and the process commenced
again.
-
Finally, the
employee's performance should be
monitored. The disciplinary action
should be followed up with the
object of encouraging improvement
and progress should be regularly
discussed with the individual.
